UK Budget Reforms Highlight Taxation Loophole for High-Street Slot Venues
Written by Anna Simon · Nov 1, 2026

UK Budget Reforms Highlight Taxation Loophole for High-Street Slot Venues

Chancellor John Healey’s Budget in November 2026 raised the duty on slot machine takings from 20% to 25% while removing adult gaming centres from eligibility for specific business rates discounts previously available to leisure and hospitality venues, and records from the Gambling Commission show that hundreds of high-street locations operated by companies such as Merkur and Admiral retain bingo licences that may preserve access to those discounts.
Adult gaming centres, often referred to as slot farms when they focus heavily on gaming machines, faced direct increases in operating costs under the new measures, yet operators holding dual licences for bingo activities appear positioned to maintain certain reliefs that offset the business rates changes.
Details of the Budget Adjustments
The duty increase applies directly to takings from slot machines across relevant premises, while the business rates adjustment targets venues classified strictly as adult gaming centres and removes them from discounts designed to support leisure and hospitality sectors, and this combination raises the overall tax burden for operators without bingo licences.
Venues that also hold bingo licences fall under a different regulatory category, which allows continued claims for the discounts even when the primary activity involves slot machines, and Gambling Commission data confirms that major chains maintain such dual licensing for many high-street sites.
Role of Bingo Licences in the Current Framework
Bingo licences permit operators to structure their premises in ways that align with broader leisure classifications, and this structure preserves eligibility for business rates relief despite the Budget changes aimed at adult gaming centres, while hundreds of locations owned by Merkur and Admiral demonstrate this pattern according to official records.
The distinction arises because licensing categories determine tax treatment, so venues with bingo permissions avoid full exposure to the rates shift even as their slot machine revenue faces the higher duty rate, and critics argue this creates an uneven application of the reforms.

Criticism and Calls for Regulatory Action
Observers have pointed out that the loophole allows major operators to limit the financial impact of the Budget measures, and reports from November 2026 highlight concerns that the government and the Gambling Commission should address the issue through licensing reforms to ensure consistent application across all slot-focused venues.
Calls for closure of the gap focus on aligning licensing rules more tightly with the intent of the tax changes, so that bingo licences no longer serve as a pathway to retained discounts for premises whose main activity centres on slot machines, and such reforms would require updates to how the regulator classifies and monitors dual-licence operations.
Impact on Operators and High-Street Venues
Major companies including Merkur and Admiral operate numerous sites that combine slot machines with bingo permissions, which means the Budget adjustments affect their costs unevenly depending on individual venue licensing, and this situation leaves some locations better insulated than others that lack bingo status.
High-street presence remains significant for these operators, with the licensing structure supporting continued operations under existing discounts even after the duty rise takes effect, and data from the Gambling Commission illustrates the scale of venues that hold both categories of permission.
Next Steps for Government and Regulator
Reforms to licensing procedures could close the identified gap by requiring clearer separation between bingo and adult gaming centre activities, and such changes would ensure the business rates discounts no longer apply where slot machine operations dominate, while the regulator would need to review existing licences to enforce consistency.
The government faces pressure to coordinate with the Gambling Commission on these updates, so that future Budget measures achieve uniform effects across the sector without unintended carve-outs created by overlapping licence types.
Conclusion
The November 2026 Budget introduced higher duty on slot takings and removed business rates discounts for adult gaming centres, yet bingo licences held by hundreds of high-street venues allow certain operators to maintain relief eligibility, and this development has prompted calls for licensing reforms to align regulatory categories with the tax policy goals.